Aluminum Cutting Fluid Selection: What You Need to Know
Key factors to consider when selecting, maintaining and troubleshooting cutting fluids for aluminum machining.
Key factors to consider when selecting, maintaining and troubleshooting cutting fluids for aluminum machining.
Aluminum has long been a favorite among machinists. Yes, high silicon grades are abrasive, and chip control can be tricky during turning operations. Thermal expansion is sometimes problematic with tight-tolerance parts, chatter tends to occur with frustrating regularity, and surface finishes may deteriorate as cutting tools wear or become “gummed up” due to built-up edge (BUE). For the most part, though, machine shops would much rather produce aluminum parts all day than, say, those made of Inconel or another heat-resistant superalloy.
Despite these positive attributes, manufacturers have plenty of ways to optimize the aluminum machining process. Choose tools specifically designed for the alloy, which in most cases means a high-helix drill, end mill or insert with a polished cutting surface. In many cases, you can skip the coating, although a titanium nitride (TiN) or zirconium nitride (ZrN) PVD-coated tool rarely hurts. And consider diamond tooling—PCD or brazed—if the application (and your budget) warrants.
However, starting with the correct cutting fluid is just as important as it is when machining more difficult materials, says Tim Stiers, engineering manager for Castrol, a division of BP America. Read on to learn what Stiers recommends.
Aluminum stands out due to its distinctive combination of material characteristics and coolant requirements. Its softness and ductility—often referred to as “gumminess”—makes it easier to cut compared with harder metals, but also leads to BUE formation and other cutting tool failure modes, Stiers says.
Additionally, aluminum’s high thermal conductivity enables it to dissipate heat rapidly, which helps prevent thermal damage during machining; however, careful management is necessary to avoid accelerated tool wear. Its low density further enhances its appeal in industries such as aerospace, automotive and consumer electronics, where reducing weight is a critical design consideration.
The sheer number of aluminum alloys also complicates cutting fluid selection. “For example, the cast aluminums used in automotive components cut much differently than the wrought aluminums typical of aerospace parts. In addition, the high silicon content in some aluminum alloys can present challenges to cutting fluids, including poor emulsion stability over time and degradation of tool life due to silicon’s abrasiveness,” Stiers says. Another issue unique to aluminum is that the chips tend to float due to their light weight, making good filtration and chip management essential.
Water-miscible, semi-synthetic and synthetic fluids are by far the most commonly used in aluminum machining. Straight oils are typically used only in cutting operations where surface finishes are critical and tool life must be maximized. “That said, oils are ideal for low-speed, high-precision aluminum machining operations such as tapping, reaming or deep-hole drilling, offering excellent lubricity that minimizes BUE and enhances surface finish and tool life,” Stiers says.
However, oil has limited heat dissipation, can be messy, and is far less suited for high-speed or high-volume production. Water-soluble fluids are the preferred choice here due to their superior cooling capabilities, ease of cleaning, and—with the correct cutting fluid—the ability to perform even very difficult operations and provide the lubricity needed for smooth surface finishes.
In general, the fluids used in aluminum machining require higher physical lubricity at the point of cut than standard fluids. They should also be designed to prevent staining of the metal (or chemically inhibited from doing so) and must be capable of handling higher silicon content where applicable.
Due to the large number of aluminum alloys and possible operations, the correct fluid is best determined by discussing the process details with your supplier. “Castrol has extensive data that we can use to match the best fluid for the metallurgy and machining operation, plus we can perform testing in our laboratory for new or unique processes,” Stiers says.
Process controls, such as ensuring good coolant flow to the point of cut, providing effective chip evacuation and maintaining positive filtration to remove fines, are all important. Be cautious when choosing a fluid based solely on price, Stiers says.
Typically, a modest investment in a higher-performing coolant will yield a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) due to reduced coolant usage, longer sump life, improved part finishes and less rework.
Maintaining concentration within the proper range is crucial for optimal coolant performance. This can be determined by working with your fluid supplier and taking into account past experiences as well. “Concentration checks should be conducted at least daily, preferably at the beginning of each shift,” Stiers says.
This is easily accomplished with a handheld refractometer, which the operator should first zero out with water from the tap used during the initial fill. Then, check the coolant to determine the Brix percentage and multiply that value by the specific coolant factor (which varies for each product) to obtain the coolant concentration. More advanced testing, such as alkalinity, pH, dirt, tramp oil and bacteria, can be conducted in the fluid supplier’s laboratory as needed, a step often recommended for central systems and larger individual machines.
Stiers recommends the following checklist to investigate common problems:
First, ensure the proper coolant has been selected for the metals and operations being performed.
Next, check the concentration to ensure it is within the proper range as described earlier. Ensure the coolant has adequate flow to the point of cut, checking each coolant nozzle for accurate alignment.
Check the filtration unit to ensure it is performing correctly.
Ensure air entrainment and foam in the coolant are not excessive.
Check for excessive oil leaks in the hydraulic system, slideways and spindle that could contribute to tramp oil in the coolant.
Verify that the coolant emulsion remains tight, since it can be affected by high silicon aluminum and/or high water hardness.
Submit a coolant sample to the lab for advanced testing and troubleshooting, including lubricant levels, dirt and fines at various micron sizes, metal contamination, tramp oil, pH, bacteria, and other relevant parameters.
Ensure the longest possible coolant life through sound routine maintenance practices, with concentration being the most critical factor. As suggested earlier, check this daily using a properly calibrated refractometer. When levels are low, the operator should add coolant concentrate while the fluid is circulating to ensure proper mixing.
Operators should also regularly introduce fresh concentrate to maintain additive levels. Tramp oil, which promotes bacterial growth and can affect machining performance, should be controlled using skimmers or shop vacs, and machine oil leaks should be prioritized for repair to prevent contamination. To avoid stagnant coolant and bacterial buildup, circulation or aeration should be performed during extended periods of machine downtime.
Water plays an important role as well. Check the quality of your water source and make necessary improvements. Note that salt-based softeners are not suitable for coolant systems, except as pre-treatment for reverse osmosis (RO) units.
Finally, good housekeeping and hygiene practices are vital to maintaining a clean and safe coolant system. These include keeping contaminants out, minimizing skin contact, using proper PPE and only adding approved chemicals to the coolant (do not use bleach or sanitizer tablets).
“If in doubt, don’t hesitate to contact your cutting fluid supplier,” Stiers says.
Learn More: Milling Aluminum: Tools to Tackle Industry’s Favorite Switch-Hitter